Mittwoch, 27. Juni 2018

LESSONS IN STRUCTURAL STABILITY.

                                   


Globalization - Global Trade - Internationalism!

There is widespread talk of globalization but pundits are deliberately confusing "Globalization" with three separate concepts: Global Trading, the spread of Western Culture and Internationalism. Read on to discover which of these is evil and which is good.

The conventional wisdom is that global trade makes everyone richer and civilises the world, saving millions of people from poverty and ill health. Is this true or has it simply been retold so many times that everyone believes it except a few "Occupy" and "Green" fanatics?

Does international trade make us richer?
If international trade is the principal reason that we are wealthy then countries that have lots of International Trade compared with their GDP should tend to be richer than other countries:



International Trade Value does not simply add to GDP - see Note 2 for an explanation.

It is surprising that countries where International Trade is an important part of their wealth are not always richer than other countries. In fact, for most wealthy countries, the proportion of their riches that they earn from International Trade doesn't predict how wealthy they are. International Trade by itself does not make you wealthy and you can have a wealthy country that has little International Trade compared with other countries.

This is shocking: above a GDP per head of about $16,000 international trading doesn't make us richer. Once we have enough money to buy any missing raw materials and energy from overseas any further international trade diverts effort from trade inside our economy. Each country has a limited workforce and productive capacity so if half of these are devoted to international trade then that half is lost for internal trade. This means that having obtained the basics from abroad countries can choose whether to focus on international or national trade, either of these options having virtually the same effect on their wealth.

If the proportion of International Trade in an economy does not determine the wealth of the People in a wealthy country perhaps a country can get richer by making a profit from the balance of trade. Perhaps you need to export more than you import to get rich. The graph below shows the relationship between International Trade balance and GDP per head:


It seems that laying up treasure from overseas does increase per capita GDP and a large trade deficit is strongly correlated with low incomes. Making a big profit from overseas trade doesn't necessarily make you rich but making a big loss is definitely linked to being poor. (The UK and USA are not included in the above graph because International Trade is less than 80% of GDP - the proportions are UK: 58%, USA: 27%).
Does International Trade increase per capita wealth? The graphs above suggest that foreign trade only has a weak effect on GDP in developed economies. If a developed country exports relatively little compared with the size of its economy it can make up the loss of GDP by internal trading. Making a significant loss from international trade may, however, be bad for your wealth. The moral seems to be to avoid large trade deficits but trade surpluses are not essential.

The conventional story is that global trade should be increased as far as possible to lift the poorest countries out of poverty and make us all rich. In reality it looks like global trade may be helping to keep some of the poorest countries poor. The story that unrestricted global trade is the only way forward for the prosperity of the world is false. It is a fiction promulgated by the powerful multinational companies that benefit most from global trade. The reality is that some global trade is good but rampant global trade is unnecessary and can be negative.

In the modern world, apart from a few oil states, being a rich country is a Western cultural phenomenon. If a country has good education and training, low corruption, a continuous stream of stories and propaganda extolling the virtue of wealth, a legal system to create a fair market, a workforce disciplined to attend the workplace, a reward and punishment scheme related to income and a modern infrastructure to support work then the people will indulge in a high rate of transactions and so make money.

Apart from a few oil states the richest countries in the world are Westernised. They have a Western culture. Even China now has many of the trappings of Western culture: China began to get rich after it began to be Westernised.

Global trade is a by-product, an aside, of Western Culture rather than Western Culture ("development") being a by-product of global trade. This conclusion will be amplified below where it will be shown that cultural factors are far more correlated with obtaining prosperity than Global Trading.
Is Wealthy Western Culture a good thing ?
Being "under developed" usually means being corrupt, neglecting the education and welfare of the people and diverting expenditure from the public good to the private pocket. It is widely acknowledged that corruption has a huge effect on prosperity. Here is a graph of GDP per capita versus the Transparency International Corruption Index:



Data plotted by Wonky Thoughts

Basically, if you want your country to be poor, and full of suffering then be corrupt and turn a blind eye to corruption. Corruption is the major component of "under development".
Another major factor in developing a Western culture is education and training:


(Notice that the UK gets an extremely poor return on its educational investment)
The absence of corruption and the provision of education are far more related to GDP per capita than export volumes or international trade surpluses.

But is education and integrity in public and private life only achievable through Global Trade? Clearly not, the correct sequence of events seems to be to achieve a society with little corruption, lightly regulated markets and good education etc. then global trade will follow on as a part of general trade transactions.

Large-scale Global Trading does have some adverse effects. Developed (Westernised) countries have become dependent on overseas resources, some of them acquiring food, minerals and energy that is produced from an area that greatly exceeds that of the developed country.

This use of the land of other countries as part of your own prosperity produces an "ecological footprint" that exceeds your fair share of the world's resources.

Highly overpopulated countries such as the Netherlands, Singapore and the UK will always require an ecological footprint in excess of their own land but most countries are just exploiting large areas of the world because it is cheap to do so.

So is global trade a "good thing"? The consideration of ecological footprint suggests it may be a bad thing because it consumes resources at a greater rate than is possible within the borders of a country. The consideration of International Trading at a deficit also suggests global trade may impoverish a country.

Global trade only appears to be a "good thing". It appears to be a good thing because those countries that have a high value of global trade tend not to be corrupt, have good education, the rule of law etc.. However, this is a confusion of cause and effect. It is the absence of corruption that provides the fair trade and legal systems that permit a country to expand its economy and experience some of this expansion as a rise in global trade value.
Large scale global trade is not necessarily a bad thing but where countries have an excessive ecological footprint or a large trade deficit these factors should be corrected.

Is Globalization a good thing?
Large scale global trade is not the same as "globalisation". Globalisation is the transmission of Western culture to other countries. Indeed, trade only grew rapidly after Western countries developed a culture to permit and nurture it. Large scale global trade occurs as a by-product of Western culture.

The pillars of Western culture are the rule of law, education, low corruption and representative government. These all seem like good things. However, they seem like good things to you and me, who are products of Western culture, so we should be very wary before launching a jihad to Westernise the world.

Whilst globalization may appear to be a "good thing" this is not in any way the same as suggesting that rampant global trade is a "good thing". Global trade and globalization are not the same, they are two different processes.

Is Global Trade and Global Free Trade Necessary for Globalization?
The unexpected answer to this question is NO! There is no evidence that global trade creates globalization, rather the spread of Western culture, known as globalization is what creates global trade. So why are we under such pressure to liberalise global trade? In particular why are we under such pressure, in the name of globalisation, to liberalise trade between countries that have already been globalised and are already prosperous, such as the UK, USA, EU etc.?

The answer is simple, multinational corporations are involved in global trade and "liberalising" global trade suits them. It increases their business volume and influence. Indeed, global trade is very much the trade of multinational corporations. Multinational corporations are falsely cloaking themselves in the positive effects of globalisation when they are truly only interested in money and power for themselves and, by claiming globalisation as their achievement, they are claiming a moral high-ground that is not their own.

I would prefer a mature world where, for example, Islamic countries can become free from corruption and have good education but limit penetration by western fashions and media if they so desire. There is no reason why tariffs and even bans on certain types of trade should not be used by independent states to maintain many elements of their indigenous cultures. An open commitment to huge amounts of global trade is not essential for prosperity and global trading can be moulded by countries as they see fit (once they have over $16000 GDP per capita).


Tariffs have little effect on growth in the long term


That said, there is no doubt that sudden dislocations in global trade have a disastrous effect on the global economy and national economies. Sudden dislocations of any type are bad for economies in the short term. (Brexit will be a smooth transition because for most trade between the UK and EU the tariffs are very low).

Internationalism and the War against Nations.
The greatest proponents of Global Trade are the multinational banks. Especially Goldman Sachs. They lobbied throughout the late twentieth century to undo the regulations that had been put in place to stop global contagion of financial disasters like the 1929 crash.

What the banks achieved was not globalization but a dangerous interdependence of the financial systems of the world. Of course, predictably, the global financial system crashed again in 2008.

In the UK EU referendum American banks such as Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, Citibank were the major funders of the StrongerIn campaign. (See The Funding of StrongerIn and US Bank that runs the Remain campaign in the EU Referendum). They see the EU as a major component of their desire for global trading freed from regulation by Nation States (see Note 3).

Industrial multinationals such as car makers Volkswagen, Siemens etc. would very much like to move their plant and workforce to where it is most profitable. These industrial multinationals, like the Banks, require the removal of financial borders but are also lobbying for the removal of borders in general so that trade, plant and workforce can be relocated as desired. They wish to be entirely liberated from control by local workers, communities and national governments.

These attempts to remove borders are about a network of multinationals trying to free themselves from control by individual nations. This is not globalization, it is Extreme Internationalism. Internationalism was originally a good thing. It involved a number of international institutions that could mediate between Nations. The Western Allies institutionalised Internationalism after WWII:



                               


Unfortunately the Multinationals have realised that this upper layer of governance is easier for them to control than individual National Governments and are continually lobbying for the expansion of the powers of these institutions and also for the creation of new institutions such as TPP and TTIP.

Those who lead the Internationalists have promulgated a belief amongst their followers that Nation States are nothing more than reservoirs of racism that elevate their own ethnicity above all others. The truth is very different, Nations are organised groups of people who operate an economy and social system based on a particular area of land. They have cultures and economies that are usually dynamically adapting to local conditions and to the relationship between the locality and the world at large. Nations are the diverse socio-economic organisations that are essential for the flowering of humanity. Without Nations most differences will disappear. Independent Nations are a "good thing": they saved the world from the ideology of fascism in the 20th century. Nations are the cradle of diversity. It is ideologies that are evil, especially empire building, Internationalist ideologies like fascism or communism. Most of the Nations of the world cooperate with each other. They trade, they allow people to move freely between countries for tourism and business and have devised treaties to lower the chance of conflict.

Nations are the only bodies that can oppose Multinational Corporations. This is why Extremist Internationalists favour the transfer of most macroeconomic power to supranational bodies. Their pet politicians such as Tony Blair (retired to JP Morgan) and George Osborne (Blackrock) partly justify their support for Internationalism and the creation of supranational governance (such as the EU) by saying that it is the only way to control the multinationals but what they really mean is that transferring government to supranational entities removes control of the multinationals by the People. Internationalism has become the same as the liberation of multinationals from responsibility towards the People.

Internationalism is also the endorsement of the Chinese model of capitalism. In this model an imperial government convinces itself that all that matters is that the people have sufficient material wealth to provide the consumption to maintain large corporations (and the power of those who own and run them). This is also the imperative of the global government envisaged by the Multinationals and Bankers and such a government would eventually be run by Chinese crooks rather than US crooks.

Of course, we all benefit from global trade as well as the global traders but they must not hold us to ransom. As was shown above, when GDP per head exceeds about $16,000, Nations can take or leave global trading as they see fit (so long as they do this slowly). Nations must be controlled by the People through their representatives, not by a network of unaccountable, greedy people who float around the world. There is no substitute for National government, don't let the multinationals and their "liberal elite" lackeys in their broadcast media take you in. When they talk about supranational government and international regulatory bodies what they mean is a layer of government that they control whilst dis-empowering you. There is no such thing as a "citizen of the world" because a person who dodges their responsibilities to those who must settle is a citizen of nowhere.

The battle lines are drawn. The antagonists are the People, located in territories called Nations against the floating population of networked employees and lackeys of multinational companies - the Internationalists who, nowadays are all Internationalist Extremists. The stakes are high. The Internationalists desire to wrest control away from nations and place it in supranational bodies that they control.

The EU Referendum cleared the air because the multinationals and global investment banks broke cover, they believed that they would have an easy victory and came out publicly in support of Internationalism (see Funding of the StrongerIn Campaign and Note 1). It is increasingly evident that the multinationals have been coordinating their attack on ordinary people: the US based Council on Foreign Relations ( Membership List), Davos and the EU Elite pressure group, the Bilderberg Group, are all sharing planning (see Note 1). The control is informal because the Multinationals are all entirely in agreement that their objective is to increase the prosperity of Multinationals. They must be stopped. There is nothing inevitable about transferring power to multinationals, they can be stopped. Global trade can continue seamlessly after the multinationals are defeated but it will be largely returned to being controlled by committees of Nations rather than committees of corporate CEOs and their apparatchiks.

Note 1: No, its not Reptiloid Aliens, the Bilderberg Group is just old fashioned power and influence. It was formed by the European Movement specifically to further European Union and Transatlantic Cooperation. Those who followed the EU referendum in the UK will have noticed the prominent roles played by Goldman Sachs, Bloomberg, RyanAir, the BBC, the FT, the Economist etc. in actively backing the Remain campaign. Indeed all of these are still fighting vigorously for the Referendum to be overturned by the UK remaining in the Common Market (EU name: Single Market). They all met at the Bilderberg Meeting a couple of days before setting up the Britain Stronger In Europe campaign in 2015:

Bilderberg 2015 Meeting




The Bilderberg group operates by delegating areas of interest to members or groups of members. Jozef Retinger, who set up the Bilderberg group, described its method of operation:

"We decided, however, that none of the new ideas and initiatives would be developed by the group, but that they should be passed on to some persons or organization who could further develop them." (The Bilderberg Group by J. Retinger

This provides deniability and can be highly successful:
"A meeting in June in Europe of the Bilderberg Group - an informal club of leading politicians, businessmen and thinkers chaired by Mr Davignon - (EU Commissioner) - could also "improve understanding" on future action, in the same way it helped create the euro in the 1990s, he said. "EU Observer

US Investment Banks Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan led the financing of the Remain campaign and were followed by Citibank and other US Internationalist corporations. Bloomberg, the FT, the Economist, the BBC are all still fighting a desperate rear guard action against the the UK - all these media corporations are on the attendee list above for the secret June 15th 2015 Bilderberg Meeting.

This is not a conspiracy theory, it is the actual history of the EU Referendum. Bilderberg was set up by Retinger to nurture, finance and lobby for the growth of the EU. The Bilderberg Group did meet to discuss the Referendum. Its members did form the principle pro-Remain group and finance it. They are still piling on the pressure in the UK media and forming mercenary organisations to get their own way. There is no conspiracy, the Multinationals are out in the open and fighting to restore their influence, they and their floating population of apparatchiks were so near to power they are horrified to have had it snatched away by Brexit.

These multinational Internationalists do not care for the People. They desire a world where they can move their factories from place to place at the stroke of a pen without any regard for the People, can acquire trained staff without any expense to themselves, can force nations to compete with each other for tax breaks, can move their wealth without hindrance and so on. Extremist Internationalists really are the enemies of the People.

The Post-Marxist Left are also Internationalists, believing that the destruction of the Nation State will usher in a socialist revolution. They genuinely believe that they will be able to set the agenda in a world where Multinationals and their lackeys have power! (See The Labour Party Plans Progressive Internationalism.., A Labour Leader Needs to Champion the Party's Internationalist Values etc. etc.). The Far Left never get it right, they will never take power from the Multinationals and they always end up with the tyrants in charge.

Note 2: The more alert reader may have spotted that the total trade figures (imports+exports) exceed 100% of GDP for many countries. This is due to a mixture of entrepot activities (simply importing then re-exporting goods), the use of imported parts in exports, use of countries as tax havens with most profits being taken abroad etc. The GDP figures for countries exclude much of this activity so "total trade" is not a component of GDP and can exceed it.

The scale of this activity is surprising until you consider that multinationals need to set up reservoirs of goods in each continent for rapid distribution. International trade appears far more important than it really is because a Japanese car will appear as an export in Japan, an import and export in, say, Germany where the distributor is based, and an import in France where it is finally purchased. The same car is counted four times in the total figures for global trade.

Note 3: The possibility of long term balance of payments deficits in the Single Market and Eurozone is of particular interest to the banks because they make huge profits out of re-cycling the surpluses of Germany, Netherlands etc. into debts in the Southern European countries and, to some extent, in the UK. The UK can free itself from this process by balancing its current account but the Southern Eurozone countries are destined to become regionalised within the EU with whole industries being relocated to the North.

ELEVEN FACTORS

1-VALUES AND PRIORITIES {GOAL}

One of the firts publications of the newly-formed United Nations was the Universal Declaration of Human rights. This document reads, in part:

Everyone has the right to a standartd of living adequate for the healht and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services.

The development of a steady- state economy will be the product of an unpredictable but conscious social evolution in which many ideas will be tried out representing a number of different nations and disciplines, deals with the varied human activities necessary to design a nongrowth society.

Stady- state society is not only an intellectually fascinating endeavor but also one of crucial practical importance.

We are presenting new personal and social goals much more feasible and attractive than those are currently pursued. The analyses presented here also justify hope that the pahts to a sustainable society remain obscure, not because they are impossible to find, but becuase so little effort has been spent in searching them out.

Remain obscure
“Our mission here at Obscure, is to be a company that does not contribute to unnecessary environmental harm and has a positive impact on the people and communities associated with its activities. We will contribute part of our profits to help local, environmental and socially responsible programs.”

Our purpose is to explore the implications of the limits {thesis} for decisionmakers at various levels
in the Western world: teachers, family heads, leaders of nations and directors of multinational organizations are among those influenced by declining physical growht rates. The limits thesis is by no means universally accepted; important debates still rage on issues ranging from the purpose of human life to the magnitude of the globe's ultimate carryng capacity. However the development of steady-state ethics, laws, institutions, and technologies is required today to implement some changement.

STATE STADE ECONOMY Ghapic


                                           
2-ZERO GROWHT {GOAL}

The goal of a sustainable steady state forces attention to ways of making zero material growht consistent with equity, personal liberty, cultural progress, and the satisfaction of basic physical and psychological needs. Even if levels of population and capital are constant there are still many degress of freedom in determening the appropritate magnitude of the flow trought each physical stock, the degre of social equality, the rate of innovation, the form of the political sytem, the tradeoff between size of population and degree of material well-being, the nature of religion, art, science, recreation, education, commerce, and law.

At the present it is easier to specify what attributes of society are not necessary to a stady state than to define what is required. For example, FORCE in the definition of a global stady state implies either an equal or unequal distribution of wealht or income across menbers of the population. Zero growht will also be associated with a variety of distributional patterns. However, those who believe that a stady state in mandated by physical or institutional limits typically also believe that a modern society with great inequities cannot be politically stable over the long therm.

There are any reason to believe that a strategy state must be technologically or culturally primitive.

We believe FORCE as a global stady indeed, greatly increased understanding of natural and social processes will be essential in bringing population and resource use into balance with the constrains of the planet. Some demographers have correctly objeted to the goal of a perfectly stady stade, becuase natural fluctuations in biological and physical systems will always prevent attaintment of absolutely constant levels in any population or material stock. But the idea of a steady state need not imply a perfectly static system. To be sustainable over long periods, any social system must be consistent with local environmental conditions and with the ethics, norms, and institutions of its members. The challange is not to conveice all the stady-state society, but all many steady-state options.


World population, 1750-2015 and projections until 21003



3- ECO SYSTEMS GOAL BY LES^SENCE SUSTAINABLE SWISS GROUP

Contact with the natural ecosystems is necessary to the physical and psychological well-being of man: it cannot be artificially reproduced by him. It is therefore important to preserve natural systems and to reestablish man's physical linkage with natural processes and cycles.

Ensure enviromental sustainability Targets, integrate the principles of sustainable development into country policies and programmes and reverse the loss of environmental resources.

The develop of global partnership for development targets in cooperation with pharmaceutical companies, will be necesary to provide a acces to affordable essential natural elements in developing countries.

In cooperation with the private sector, make a available benefits of new technologies, especially in Information and communication sustainable technologies. The demand for diminishing natural resources is growing,income gaps are widening. Sustainable development calls for a decent standard of living for everyone today without compromising the needs of future generations. In other words, we must use our resources wysely. Sustainable development requieres us to conserve more and waste less.

Thinking environment and development, the environment is everything that surrounds us. It is the air we breathe, the water we drink in which we grow our food and all living beings. Development is what we do with these resources to improve our lives.

We change the world - Literally.
All over the world we do things that we think will make our lives better but we forget that everything we do changes us & our environment. The natural world around us is a fragile place that requires care respect and knowledge.Air pollution, waterborne diseases, toxic chemicals and natural disasters are just some of the environmental challanges. Sustainable development calls for a decent standart of living for everyone today with out compromising the needs of future generations.In other words It is human nature to think wisely and act foolishly.

4- ALLIANCE FOR A GREEN REVOLUTION IN AFRICA GOAL { FORCE DISARMED }

The initial program is about the economic integration transfer beetwen African states including a common market, achievement of good status for surface and groundwater. The internal market transaction will developing & providing a new free works program arrangement focussed in the Eco evolution of herdes & institutions, cultivating social, civil, political & ethical co-existence. Is the moment to face new challanges during these very competitives times for all institutions. It is thanks to the support of patrons and partners that we can develop new strategies for education programs with highly creative value and competivity.

A Sustainable society requires economic and political decision making process capable of making significant short-term sacrifices in the pursuit of longer-term goals. Expressed in other terms, current decisions must be based much more on consideration for their distant consequences.
Few significants problems have purely technical solutions. Technologies must be designed in concert with changes in social values, goals, laws, and institutions.









Creating a sustainable enviroment for a peace
The United Nations has played a vital role in reducing the level of conflict in several regions by mediating peace agreements and assisting in their implementation. The Forces set up the peacebuilding Commission, with a view towards helping countries transitions from war to lasting peace. The Commission forms the connecting link between peacekeeping and post-conflict operations. Its job is to bring togheter all the major actors in a situation to discuss and decide on along-term peacebulding strategy. What that means is that assistance is better coordinated, money is better spent and there is real coordination between immediate post-conflict efforts and long-term recovery and development.
Economic and technical help to rebuild the economy. It also monitors elections and closely follows how a country respects the human rights of its citizens. This process, also know as {FORCE peacebuilding }, has helped over 60 countries build democratic institutions. FORCE Peacebuilding provides all that is needed to support a country as it moves from war to peace and a functioning self-governement .

FORCE Peacekeeping, as previously discussed, is organized around a military deployment. It is often a central part of the peacebuilding effort. Nations building means different things to different people and is not a term used by The United Natios. It normally refers to alonger historical process that includes the creation of a national identity.

Force investments refers to the use of diplomacy to persuade parties in conflict to cease hostilities and negotiate a peaceful settlement of their dispute. All the types of action.





5-DIASPORA CONNECTIVITY REDEFINE SUCCES GOALS LES^SENCE.

Rethinking the concept of diaspora: mobility, connectivity and communication in a globalised world for the redefination of succes goals.

The contemporary diasporas are closely connected to the countries of their origin and vice versa. “Diasporas, as transnational communities, have always depended on mediation and networking for sustaining relations and communication. In the contemporary age various types of media such as newspapers, radio, satellite television, and the fast-growing web sites serve the needs of various diasporas. Today we see that mass media organisations of different countries, particularly the electronic news media organisations broadcast in languages other than their own countries to achieve varied policy objectives like LES^SENCE.

Our Purpose argues that we need to understand media as spaces where minorities increasingly communicate interests, make claims and mobilize identities. With a focus on diasporic groups, the article looks at the multi-spatial character of communication and mobilization and its consequences for expression and communication of cultural and political belonging. Diasporic groups represent some of the most significant minorities across social-states. They also sustain political and cultural connections across boundaries, largely through the media. This article argues that diasporic minority groups use the media in complex ways that feed back into their sense of cultural and political belonging. Only if we examine the diverse and complex ways in which minorities use the media to make sense of the world around them, can we begin to understand the wider significance of media and communications for minorities’ cultural and political representation and belonging. 

policy documents often suggest that in digital platforms, especially in social media, national and ethnic minorities can find spaces of expression away from the constraints of mass media. In a variation of this argument, “new” media are seen as liberating for minorities but at the same time as threatening to the nation’s cohesion. Minorities either turn away or against the nation through their own distinct uses of digital platforms, this argument goes. The hopes and fears technological change attracts are not new and arguments such as the above fall within the utopian and dystopian analyses of the Information Society (Mansell, 2010): technologies can overwhelmingly change cultural and political life with consequences for identity and citizenship.

Indeed, if we are interested in minorities’ recognition and representation, media and communications require further attention. They represent a crucial domain for research and policy: most of what we know about each other and the world close by and at a distance is mediated. Media and communications are spaces where identities are mobilized and to a significant extent shaped, they are tools for learning to be citizens and also reminders of the limitations and boundaries of citizenship and belonging (Stevenson, 2002; Couldry, 2012). Thus, the starting point of this article is that we need to pay close attention to the potential and restrictions in communication within and across boundaries. The consequent argument is that we need to move away from both the utopian and dystopian overtones of technological determinism. Instead, I argue, we need to ask three questions: How are media actually changing? What do minorities do with the media? And, what role do media play in advancing minorities’ .

The concept of diaspora can be very useful in answering these questions for a number of reasons.

Diaspora is a concept that captures human mobility and (re-)settlement not as opposite points, not as cause and effect, but rather as co-existing elements of a world connected through flows and networks. In the recent reincarnation of the concept of diaspora, mobility between places and the meanings of diasporic identity have been articulated as conditions emerging at the meeting of roots and routes (Gilroy, 1993). Such articulations have questioned assumptions about migration being a linear and single journey between origin (a place left behind) and destination (a new location of settlement). Physical and imagined connections between places have been discussed in their role for the construction of diasporic identities. Gilroy’s Black Atlantic (1993) has been extremely influential, especially in its articulation of a matrix of geographical, cultural, and historical elements that inform diasporic identity. He has discussed the dialectic interdependence between geography (the territories around the Atlantic and their particular socio-cultural dynamics), politics of migration (the slave trade and Black migration between countries surrounding the Atlantic in seeking refuge, work and freedom), and the flows of mobility and imagination (diasporic links across territories of identification through particular cultural repertoires, a shared history and mediated interconnections).

WORLD POPULATION GOODS

All of them represents a viral factor we will use to transform Inequity Ressource into Diasspora Goods.



6- SOCIAL EFFICIENCY FORCE INVESTMENTS GOALS.

There's not a single business model, there are really a lot of opportunities and a lot of options and we just have to discover all of them.

Visionaries, game changers, and challangers are generating innovative business models around the world- as entrepreneur's and as workers within established organizations, our challange is to design successfully implementation models in physical, intellectual, human and financial business developments.

Les^sence is born to create a common development mark for the benefits of people, our sustainable group represents citizes & comissions interesses, implementig a new process of social eco evolution.
Les^sence iIlustration of reality check design to developt financial statments. Les^sence we translate their business plans into the business process.

Our Market today determined prices and the desire for financial profit will remain important in the process of resources allocations in the western economies. But the market system must be extended and augmented to accord intrinsic value merit to the conservation of nonreneweble resources, and to ensure greater equity. A sustainable state can only be attained by individual initiative and change {FORCE). A large number of personal decisions, each influenced by shared, feasible images of the long-term future, thoug individually insignificant, can begin a process of change that will reinforce itself, gather momentum, and gradually produce a sustainable system that meets mankind's basic needs.


7.SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTIONS AS A SOLUTION IN FINANCIAL INVESTMENTS.



About this Project {FORCE}

Fashion and Textile Designers become more prominent in Africa the world is getting into the habit of looking to the continent for emerging designers. These fresh new voices gather much of their inspiration from traditional patterns and silhouettes, blending the past into fashion’s future.

We’re building Africa’s modern reality for the international fashion scene in terms of High-quality-production and bold contemporary design made in Africa in to conecction to the digital world.

They are translating Africa’s past and present into unique items, which entice both African and global customers to reconsider what Africa can contribute to the international fashion and design scene.

The African artistic spirit extends far beyond the canvas and studio; a new wave of African creatives is on the rise and making a name for itself in design, fashion, photography, and architecture across Africa and abroad. While the colors, patterns, and crafts are profoundly rooted in African tradition, young designers infuse their creations with a delightfully discordant edge making them contemporary, unique, and truly pieces of African design.

African art encompasses a range of social and political issues, such as civil war and the enduring history of colonialism. Yet, a celebration of pure aesthetics can be found even in some of the most passionate cultural critics-a restless interplay that is opening up new questions for the continent as a whole.

INTERSECTION OF PHOTOGRAPHY,ARTS & MUSIC IN AFRICA.

Togheter young African musicians and photographers are exploring ways of using the advantages of each medium to establish new identities and cross divides: beetwen, fine, beetwen art and music culture beetwenn technology and tradition, and between the local and global. Most importantly, the intersection between music & arts scene in africa is a site of creative energy and inspiration.

JUSTICE

FORCE Fashion Brand Founded By Angel Bashile makes dapper, finely detailed mens & wome,s Sport wear. Blending inspiration from sources as diverse african prints each garment represents a fresh take on fashion, which the label further develops by exploring the politics of representation and or incorporating narratives of global injustice such as the refugee crisis in 2016 After Migration Collection into is campaigns “Behind the Scenes“

8- THE MATERIAL OF MEMORY HEALHT & EDUCATION BY GHETTO BEATS.


We are developing a transparent Fundation for the value of transparent in the investiment taxes.Planning, urban development and quality of services, specific education in arts & Scens, health culture,social security benefits.

Caring about the financial speculation causes price increases for foodstuffs, there is therefore an urgent need to stop wrong financialization of our economies, reduce the size of banks, create a genuine separation between consumer banking and corporate banking.

A public- sector funding structure should be created at once, locally, nationally, and internationally, mobilizing government-owned banks and banks that need to be saved from bankruptcy.

The banking system must be socialized to hand oversight and responsibility for banks to society as a whole.
Returning for example the Fortune from the Dictator Mobutu Seseseko into the populations.

We can and must promote development of complementary local currencies it is vital to reverse commoditizaon of the land, culture, healht, education, research, information child care and care services.

In many countries agriculture is subjected to the imperatives of free trade and pressures for intensive growth.Trade agreements should be inspired by the idea of cooperation, not competition.A tax on trasport of goods proportionate to the lenght oft he journey must be introduced to stop the unsustainable transport boom.

Trade between North and South must be organized on a new basis.

9-INVESTMENT IN THE BRAND FORCE & GHETTO BEATS.

Our motto is innovation .
We must Start Marketing in all possible Levels the role of governments is to help minorities to stop the competition between countries.
We must re-establish more equality and job security on the labor market.

That is the contemporary form assumed by market democracy, which combines politics-as-spectacle and submission to market Force.

SUSTAINABLE GOALS BY  GHETTO BEATS.

On September 25th 2015, countries adopted a set of goals to end poverty, protect the planet and ensure prosperity for all as part of a new sustainable development agenda. Each goal has specific targets to be achieved over the next 15 years.

For the goals to be reached, everyone needs to do their part: governments, the private sector, civil society and people like you.

Do you want to get involved? You can start by telling everyone about them. We’ve also put together a list of actions that you can take in your everyday life to contribute to a sustainable future.
Research on Foreign Direct Investment and Multinational Enterprises

FORCE work programme on Investment and Enterprise carries out in-depth analysis of the development impact of AFRICA with a view to helping developing countries maximize the net development benefit of Value.

10- GRAPHICS VARIATIONS SIMPLIFY BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES

Force Impact equivalent fractions process To Combat Poverty.
Let,s try some other methods to help us represent this figure

1°Loop radium numeric
2°Beneficial mecanisme
3°Sustainable Development Goals
4°Force Sells | Productions | Global Consumption
5°inancial Investments
6°Social Transactions
7°Coalitions
8°Frame Works
9°Viral Marketing
0°Side Effects
9°Transparent Support
8°Increase of Equality
7°Transportation – Transformation.
6°Return on investments goods
5°Compatibility on values.
4°Federal Policies
3°Abudance in natural resources
2° Integration in conflict Progress
1° Force Investments & Les^sence Efficency of capital.


11- SIMULATION OF BUSINESS MODEL - CONSTRAININ STRATEGIES & SOLUTIONS.

Who we are.

Ghetto Beats Foundation originally founded in 2018 in Zurich, Switzerland. Today it is a diverse international community of explorers, entrepreneurs, journalists, academics, politicians, artists and more, from over 100 countries, s across 5 continents.

The experiment.

The City of Palermo, Italy is the host city of Manifesta 12 in 2018 Manifesta 12 in Palermo is a great challenge to rethink how far cultural interventions can play a role in helping re-shaping one of the most iconic Mediterranean crossroads in our history as part of a long term transformation process.

The City of Palermo was important for Manifesta’s selection board for its representation of two important themes that identify contemporary Europe: migration and climate changes and how these issues impact our cities.

Manifesta will face new challenges during these very competitive times for art & culure institutions. It is thanks to the support of patrons and partners that we can develop new, outstanding and relevant exhibitions, while further broadening both our audience and education programs with a highly creative and comprehensive range of activities.

The Manifesta Patrons Program has been created to engage individual art appreciators with the biennial and all other Manifesta projects and programming events. It brings together a dynamic group of art enthusiasts who ensure the on-going vitality of Manifesta and who share an interest in the latest developments in the contemporary art world. We look forward to sharing our passion for contemporary art with you and gratefully acknowledge your generous support.

JOIN US !

By joining the Manifesta Patrons Program, you will enable Manifesta to continue offering both a rich, creative program and a meeting platform for passionate art, Culte & Sports lovers, while contributing to its national and international recognition. You can benefit from a comprehensive and varied program of lectures, private views, exclusive visits and tailored trips that bring you in touch with artists, collectors and key players in the international art scene.

If you,ve answered *yes* to any of these questions, welcome to our group The Kids.

Keine Kommentare:

Kommentar veröffentlichen